You are here

Rank Wh*res

Before posting make sure you are aquainted with our forum rules.

36 posts / 0 new
Last post
Offline
Rank Wh*res
Yes
41% (19 votes)
No
59% (27 votes)
Total votes: 46

Should people who only play once a week to keep their rank and spot in the highscore lose 1/3 of their points?
Cause people like Rami and Anubis play once a week with 1300s to stay in highscore and thats just annoying as fck.

U decide and lets hope Wallyson will do something anout the poll results.

Pjush's picture
Offline
Champion
Clan: HC

Nobody cares cmon :p

Offline

ppjush i care about ur size of boobs/

Pjush's picture
Offline
Champion
Clan: HC

Oki

Wallyson's picture
Offline

Hello Lanvin

 

I think we can't do anything about this subject.

Maybe the users like Rami and Anubis doesn't have time to play, or only once a week.

I think the rank starts decreasing in 2-3 weeks, but we can't start decreasing the rank in the first week...

 

Have a nice day!

Kind Regards

Wallyson

Offline
Champion

and pls ban simka121 and .simi .. always saving rank :c

yes nonsense, dont forget they can lose with this smart tactic , i dont know how many -50 or what. They can get disconected crash or something.

nML
Offline
Clan: LvLy

rank decay is completely bullshit imo,  in contrast to that there should even be some rank barrier preventing you from downranking so much. e.g. if you manage to hold 1,4k for 4 weeks, you will never fall lower. same with 1,6k, 1,8k or even 2k. has only advantages and would prevent you from losing your well deserved rank by lags, bugs or even teaming/retards. think about it.

6stijn6's picture
Offline

You dont lose any rank wallyson if you play once a week. And besides that I think they need to reduse those rank whores:)

Red Speed Pro

Wallyson's picture
Offline

Stijn,

 

Maybe they only have time to play once a week? Can you prove it to me that they are saving ranks?

 

Kind Regards

Wallyson

Offline
Champion

It's their choice. They aren't breaking any rules, only using the rules to their advantages. 

Of course this could suck for you guys, but not every player has to go with the mainstream.

Offline

WHy did you reset  "Mepyk" then? All he did was play with noobs because maybe he wasn't good enough? "Not every player has to go with the mainstream, and play with higher people"

Offline
Champion

Those accounts left several rooms in order to get minus ranking.

Offline

Mepyk didn't leave any games, the others did but , can you prove that they didn't disconnect all the time?

Offline
Champion

Lanvin wrote:

Mepyk didn't leave any games, the others did but , can you prove that they didn't disconnect all the time?

 

vouuuch !!

DOWN WITH THE RANK WHOOORES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FIGHT FOR FREEDOM FOR FAIR ACTIVE PLAYERS !!!!!!!! MAKE A 1v1 RANKING IN CF !!!!!!!!

Offline
Clan: LvLy

they achieved their rank in a fair way, so where is your legitimation to reduce a correctly achieved rank?

BANANORPION - HALF-BANANA HALF-SCORPION †'s picture
Offline
Clan: sigh

I think there should be introduced something else in the statistics to show who is ranksaving or not. Maybe something like an activity meter, to show who's been active recently.

Here's something like: you played 50 ffa games or + in the last 15 days, you're considered as 100% ffa active. If you didn't, as example, if you only played 5 games, you're 10% active. And if you fall below 10%, you lose rank everyday until you get back above (which means, until you played 5 games in the last 15 days. Which is not much, actually, this is just an example.)

Spoiler: Highlight to view
If you read this you're a curious person.

Offline
Champion

Nevermind314 wrote:

they achieved their rank in a fair way, so where is your legitimation to reduce a correctly achieved rank?

my explanation of reaching a rank "in a fair way":

playing against people YOUR rank.. 2200 ranked people should play at least vs people ranked 1800 or more.. (i would say 2000 or more, but since here are not SO MANY people having high rank, 1800 is kind of okay) .. of course the risk to lose more than win some points is higher, but where is the sense to keep a high rank when you can't actually "keep" it on that level?
is it fair to the people who try to become better and also are better than some of the high ranked people who were good ONCE but not anymore?
it's UNFAIR for others BUT yes salietje is right, they are using the CF RULES on their ADVANTAGE.. something has to be changed here
in last days and months here are everywhere reports about everything..
and sadly nothing has been changed.. only new icons or colours or idk what get implemented to get more coins and coins.. all want only money :S

my word of sunday

 

 

BANANORPION - HALF-BANANA HALF-SCORPION wrote:

I think there should be introduced something else in the statistics to show who is ranksaving or not. Maybe something like an activity meter, to show who's been active recently.

Here's something like: you played 50 ffa games or + in the last 15 days, you're considered as 100% ffa active. If you didn't, as example, if you only played 5 games, you're 10% active. And if you fall below 10%, you lose rank everyday until you get back above (which means, until you played 5 games in the last 15 days. Which is not much, actually, this is just an example.)

again a nice idea.. but really no one cares of the mods :S :(

Offline
Clan: RIP

The rank decoy shouldn be increased imo, because players who have deserved a high ffa rank shouldnt lose it if they go on vacation etc. What should be changed, is that this game needs a seperate 1v1 ranking. Rami isnt 2.3k in ffa. Hes 2.3k in 1v1. Put him in a 8 man thin lobby with 2k+ and ill promise u he will lose. 1V1 RANKING FOR CF IS NEEDED!!!

Offline
Champion

What about that "minimum weekly plays" only count if you play in you're average room , between -300 and +500 rank  from player's rank 

http://curvefever.com/achtung/match/14313672

 

unvalid to count as weekly play --> anubis 2200 , average 1500 ( with anubis ) . radius : 1800- .2700

 

 

Everyone who says rank should not be decreased dont get idea of rank. Its not your lifetime achievement this rank. Rank should show your current form compared to other players. I agree this could be fixed, but not exactly salietje suggested way , players should not be be limited to opponent rank cause sometimes they dont have time to wait someone to join cause there isnt enough players. So smart  way of of showing your form is definately  playing every day rule

Like if player doesnt play for 2 days he should lose rank already or something. But not a lot ,like 1 point or 2. Dont forget that rank purpose is to show your current form. Many players reason of losing is, First game of the day so imagine how many skill they lose if they dont play for week. And every players should be able to froze rank decreasing for 2 weeks in one or two months, thats it you dont play you lose atleast 1 point or something but you lose faster and you shouldnt be told against who you should play.

Offline

Like its not addictive enough this way, rank decrese everyday is even worse. Why dont we make everyone has finite equal rank. Why dont we make everyone must play same item set until they die.

Best part is "and thats just annoying as fck.", this really made me laugh. People not playing -> he finds it annnoying.

If you are think that Anubis doesnt deserve 2xxx challenge him.

In the end, why does that bother you? I just dont understand.
Who cares if they are protecting rank, its legitimate however. 

Not everyone has time to play every day whole day.

:*

 

tinklepit ur comment little stupid u dont understand situtation at all why get into it?

Lanvin has a point, rank system rules are made to show players current form, when there is enough people who get advantage of rank system it should be fixed.

O_Q
Offline

Most def yes. Please excuse me if I happen to repeat things that have been posted here already, but I don't really feel like reading all the comments atm, maybe later on.

I think It's disgusting.. and Wally please, it has NOTHING to do with how busy they are... they play a game once a day to maintain their rank.

In my opinion they sin twice - not only have they achieved it by playing 1V1 FULL MAP (most of them, but yeah, imo there should be a different ranking (if at all) for 1V1 games.. I don't think people should receive ranks for 1V1 FULL MAP. Points should be given as if it is an ordinary SCALED 1V1.. that would make a lot more sense), but they also hog it and 'don't risk' it. They aren't the only ones. There is also Arctic Voices (sorry for taking you as an example, I know there are plenty more, but yeah..), with his multiple accounts, and he does the same (playes once a week vs 1300s or so to maintain his 22XX).

Yes, their rank should be reduced.

O.Cue,
 

Offline

It is completly legitimate way, how is my coment stupid. He/you/... are pissed because someone achieved that rank, and keeps saving it. 

Your comments are little stupid because without any basis you assume that they are saving rank by playing once a week.

 

Offline
Clan: RIP

TinklePit wrote:

It is completly legitimate way, how is my coment stupid. He/you/... are pissed because someone achieved that rank, and keeps saving it. 

Your comments are little stupid because without any basis you assume that they are saving rank by playing once a week.

 

They are. Stop being a bumlicker. THERE SHOULD BE A SEPERAT RANK FOR 1v1 GAMES FINITOO 

Offline

haha

Of courseee, here we have the faggot community talking ***** once again, losers

Isn't it sad to be SO jealous of other people's accomplishments, that you want to remove their names from a list ??? GET A LIFE

O_Q you especially are pathetic, just because YOU feel like playing snake game for 2-4 hours every day doesn't mean other people wants to do that. When someone played himself to a great posistion on the world ranking page in this game, and they feel like "Ok, enough life spent on snake game" and wants to retire while proud of their achievement, why should they even lose rank at all ?!? If they didn't CHEAT what's the goddamn problem !!?

In CHESS it doesn't work this way. Using a more advanced aproach to the Elo system, players are given a rating deviation. Shortly explained, it estimates the % chance you have to win against another player. RD depends on how recently you've been playing. If you have played a lot of games recently, your RD will be low, and if you haven't played for a long time RD will be big. If you have, say, 1500 rank and a low RD, the game will say "I am 95% sure you are between 1450-1550", and if you have a really huge RD "I am 95% sure your rating is between 400 and 2400". This will drastically effect the rating changes made after next played game. Your rank won't decrease magically on it's own, however.

Since Curve Fever has been based on the same rating system (elo) I think this approach would be the most logical. There is already a brief kind of RD the first 10 games played on a new account, but players who reached a high rank should be able to keep it if they don't play, as an honor - which is basically the only possible reward from spending time on this game. Like the price from winning a tournament - honor by a champion title. But if they haven't played for a long time, a public RD could be displayed on their profile, to show how much the points might differentiate

 

All in all, stop the jealousy. Get good and surpass them yourselves if you feel like, in whatever way necesarry. (Using the 'I don't care about rank' argument at this point would prove explicit intellectual disability, so save urselves...)

 

Auf wiedersehen

-Bayern

Offline
Clan: RIP

theBayernMunchencf wrote:

Of courseee, here we have the faggot community talking ***** once again, losers

Isn't it sad to be SO jealous of other people's accomplishments, that you want to remove their names from a list ??? GET A LIFE

O_Q you especially are pathetic, just because YOU feel like playing snake game for 2-4 hours every day doesn't mean other people wants to do that. When someone played himself to a great posistion on the world ranking page in this game, and they feel like "Ok, enough life spent on snake game" and wants to retire while proud of their achievement, why should they even lose rank at all ?!? If they didn't CHEAT what's the goddamn problem !!?

In CHESS it doesn't work this way. Using a more advanced aproach to the Elo system, players are given a rating deviation. Shortly explained, it estimates the % chance you have to win against another player. RD depends on how recently you've been playing. If you have played a lot of games recently, your RD will be low, and if you haven't played for a long time RD will be big. If you have, say, 1500 rank and a low RD, the game will say "I am 95% sure you are between 1450-1550", and if you have a really huge RD "I am 95% sure your rating is between 400 and 2400". This will drastically effect the rating changes made after next played game. Your rank won't decrease magically on it's own, however.

Since Curve Fever has been based on the same rating system (elo) I think this approach would be the most logical. There is already a brief kind of RD the first 10 games played on a new account, but players who reached a high rank should be able to keep it if they don't play, as an honor - which is basically the only possible reward from spending time on this game. Like the price from winning a tournament - honor by a champion title. But if they haven't played for a long time, a public RD could be displayed on their profile, to show how much the points might differentiate

 

All in all, stop the jealousy. Get good and surpass them yourselves if you feel like, in whatever way necesarry. (Using the 'I don't care about rank' argument at this point would prove explicit intellectual disability, so save urselves...)

 

Auf wiedersehen

-Bayern

I guess youre one of the 1v1 speed players since u aint posting from your main. w/e it should still be a separate 1v1 ranking

Daniël's picture
Offline

Lol, do you get punished if you play once a week?
Then you also have to punish players who play every day, because they improve their rank too much.

CurveFever Clans Moderator
CurveFever Moderator
Don't you deal with my decisions, please send me a private message.

O_Q
Offline

theBayernMunchencf wrote:

Of courseee, here we have the faggot community talking ***** once again, losers

Isn't it sad to be SO jealous of other people's accomplishments, that you want to remove their names from a list ??? GET A LIFE

O_Q you especially are pathetic, just because YOU feel like playing snake game for 2-4 hours every day doesn't mean other people wants to do that. When someone played himself to a great posistion on the world ranking page in this game, and they feel like "Ok, enough life spent on snake game" and wants to retire while proud of their achievement, why should they even lose rank at all ?!? If they didn't CHEAT what's the goddamn problem !!?

I haven't bothered reading beyong that point, so let me comment on this load of bullshit.

"O_Q you especially are pathetic, just because YOU feel like playing snake game for 2-4 hours every day doesn't mean other people wants to do that."

First of all, check my personal page and tell me if I play "snake games for 2-4hours every day", I have probably played 2 or so in the past couple of days.

"When someone played himself to a great posistion on the world ranking page in this game, and they feel like "Ok, enough life spent on snake game" and wants to retire while proud of their achievement, why should they even lose rank at all ?!?

If this is the case, then why would Arctic Voices play on his multiple other accounts (Aerens or w/e, Ansharja, etc) instead of his highest? Do you honestly believe it's because he has no time?  

"wants to retire while proud of their achievement, why should they even lose rank at all ?!? If they didn't CHEAT what's the goddamn problem !!?"

In this case I wouldn't say nothing at all. If a player stops because he doesn't play anymore, that's all good, obviously. But when a player intentionally stops just to hog his position, well that's just pathetic (especially when it's 1V1 SPEED) - and this is the issue in question. Because they are in this situation.

O.Cue,
 

Zyzz' wrote:

I guess youre one of the 1v1 speed players since u aint posting from your main. w/e it should still be a separate 1v1 ranking

 

What kind of useless post?? Are you fcking kidding me????

I said nothing about 1vs1 playing, the topic is a dicussion about inactive players and if something should be done against them. What SHOULD be done something against, is the thousands of off-topic posts on every fcking topic, like yours. It's useless!!! - and I bet the reason why mods are considered to be 'slow' on the forums - WHAT DO PEOPLE EXPECT WHEN MODS HAVE TO READ THROUGH SO MUCH BULLSHIT... god.........

Forums on serious sites doesn't tolerate spam, CF should catch up on this 1. Go make a new topic about "1vs1 seperate ranking" or QQ in "off topic" instead.

About your 'main' accusation, well, thief thinks every man steal.

I'd annihilate you any day in a 8-man room

 

-Bayern

 

O_Q wrote:

I haven't bothered reading beyong that point, so let me comment on this load of bullshit.

"O_Q you especially are pathetic, just because YOU feel like playing snake game for 2-4 hours every day doesn't mean other people wants to do that."

First of all, check my personal page and tell me if I play "snake games for 2-4hours every day", I have probably played 2 or so in the past couple of days.

"When someone played himself to a great posistion on the world ranking page in this game, and they feel like "Ok, enough life spent on snake game" and wants to retire while proud of their achievement, why should they even lose rank at all ?!?

If this is the case, then why would Arctic Voices play on his multiple other accounts (Aerens or w/e, Ansharja, etc) instead of his highest? Do you honestly believe it's because he has no time?  

"wants to retire while proud of their achievement, why should they even lose rank at all ?!? If they didn't CHEAT what's the goddamn problem !!?"

In this case I wouldn't say nothing at all. If a player stops because he doesn't play anymore, that's all good, obviously. But when a player intentionally stops just to hog his position, well that's just pathetic (especially when it's 1V1 SPEED) - and this is the issue in question. Because they are in this situation.

 

There is no rule against multiple accounts, and a random snake game shouldn't modify a sacred, complex rating system upon such a factor as time a player should - or should not - spend playing.

Again, you are QQ'ing about a game mode, 1vs1 speed, and this topic discussion isn't about this issue. Actually the OP here is often playing 1vs1 speed, and reached quite a high rank earlier by it. Go make a new topic about your unjustified hatred against this gamemode, or multiple accounts.

Since you didn't read all the points and relevant knowledge I presented, well, it's your own choice to remain ignorant.

 

-Bayern

O_Q
Offline

theBayernMunchencf wrote:

Go make a new topic about your unjustified hatred against this gamemode, or multiple accounts.

I mentioned it because you suggested they "retired" or so, and I presented you with the facts to prove that they are actually very active, so don't twist my words please. Seeing how this is the second time you do this, I'm wondering what makes you think your own posts are such read-worthy (and then call those who chooose to skip them 'ignorant', as if your words are pure gold, lol) when you can't comprehend or do a simple 1+1 when discussing such a simple subject.

That'll be my last post in this thread, seeing how I'm sure you will come up with another detached-of-the-reality kind of comment, and then I will have to explain how so, and go on indefinitely. So yeah, I wish you a good week, Mr. it's-just-a-game-yet-I-post-using-this-mule-rather-than-my-actual-user-account.

Cya in game, during my 4-hours-a-day sessions. (but then again I won't know it's you, but I'll survive)

 

O.Cue,
 

Offline
Champion

I can get 2.2k+ from 1v1 speed also and I don't feel like doing it and never playing again to stay in top 10...

Rami95 is a noob, he is more like a 1700 player but he has had #1 spot for such a long time.

I have seen rami during the last month many times asking him to play me, and he always says no and plays a 1200 or something right infront of me...

Rami95 is the perfect example of someone who hasn't played properly in over a month, and obviously isnt a 2300...

Mods I need to say your reply was retarded... It's obvious what they are doing, and the ranks are spammed with players who dont play.

And also there doesn't even need to be a system implemented for this.. Just look at the players like Rami95 who havnt played anyone higher than 1300 in 1v1 for 3 months and reduce them.. Make them  do it again. Because he is obviously not 2300..

 

I also think there should be a seperate rank for 1v1 and ffa

Offline

n my opinion they sin twice - not only have they achieved it by playing 1V1 FULL MAP (most of them, but yeah, imo there should be a different ranking (if at all) for 1V1 games.. I don't think people should receive ranks for 1V1 FULL MAP. Points should be given as if it is an ordinary SCALED 1V1.. that would make a lot more sense), but they also hog it and 'don't risk' it. They aren't the only ones. There is also Arctic Voices (sorry for taking you as an example, I know there are plenty more, but yeah..), with his multiple accounts, and he does the same (playes once a week vs 1300s or so to maintain his 22XX).

 

Two questions:

Anyone mind explaining why this is the case, why full 1v1 is a sin, as opposed to scaled 1v1?  Understand I'm not challenging that it is a sin, just curious as to why.   It seems one can take risks or not in any format, and jumpy/skippy opponents who are getting or bordering on lag warnings are less of a problem on a full screen.

Also, is it possible to have one's rank disabled?  I doubt I'll ever get a high enough rank to make these guys mad,  those who are irritated by full one v one players, but even at 1500 it was communicated to me that the good players frown upon anyone playing 1v1 exclusively.  "We know what you're doing", followed by a number of those malfunctioning games where only the start of each round displays, & I lose every point without getting to play. So I got the message, and started playing multiplayer until eventually moving on.

I guess I just wish if it were this unacceptable to play full one v one, that this option were not made available to even make a room like that in the first place, or as suggested a different rating system for it if it's going to make people angry.  Or if one can play without rank, if it would ruffle less feathers.  I don't have to worry, since I'll never be on any good players' radar anyway, but just discouraging to know it angers people to this degree.