You are here

1v1 and FFA should be SPLIT!

Before posting make sure you are aquainted with our forum rules.

32 posts / 0 new
Last post
Offline
Champion
ffa eu nr. 66
1v1 eu nr. 60
team eu nr. 26
Clan: LR
1v1 and FFA should be SPLIT!

Yes, i wanna warn mods and all players on that problem on curve ranking system. The1v1 and FFA ranks.. As we can see from first 20 - 50 players almost all got rank from 1v1. http://curvefever.com/ranks

But i think thats not fair for all other player which wanna compet in ranking stuff and cannot come close to 2200 ( just real and old are so high from ffa). This game is losing the rank competition, less and less players are even trying to have high rank, cos they know they would never make that high, so we have more and more trollers. With all this 1v1 rank explosion started rami95 ( he is playing 1v1 with 1200 now every week, hilarious) This doesn't mean that team rank system should change. 

1v1 ( speed,scale,basic) is actually easy to learn thats why players are using that to make huge amount of rank on theyre account. I made that in 1 day as evidence on what im writing now http://curvefever.com/users/d-hero

Split the FFA from 1V1, and anyone who wants rank with 1v1 can play it, rather than destroy and undervalue other players ffa8 rank. Players like : Cut,Micheal Jackson, Anubis, Rami95,Kanches,Perny,Implex are doing just that, undervaluing and destroying the rank competition of ffa8 and fight between 8 pros.

A lot players will say that i am hater of 1v1 and that im jealous etc... but fact is i that i am 1v1 player and tht i got a lot more rank from 1v1 then ffa8, but i saw that other ffa players don't like 1v1 rankers at all.

Can't geert just make 700 700 rank to all players for 1v1 and FFA, or count the rank players got from ffa and 1v1 ( ofc computer will count, it was metaphorically xD)  But changes on ffa ranking should be seriously changed, cos its worser every time i look on rankings.

Best Regards, Dan. *give_rose*

 

Offline
Champion

I agree, split the 1v1 rank away. it's annoying. since months we have same players in the top which are simply playing once a week against a Guest or 700 ranked guy...

Offline

I think it would be a good idea too, because 1V1 is completly different to FFA 8 players, you need different tactics comletely

+1 For Hero.
*-*
But in other side some players enjoy playing that,when I play 1v1 most of time its unranked coz i use that like warmup.
Smart people make ranked,nice points :33

#1st,gg.

 

lala *-*

Offline
Clan: ajta

Its a great idea but i dont know maybe some players would like to add then another ranking for speed games then or something else. or ranking for team 2v2 or team 3v3. idk o,O

Offline
Champion

Koroleva wrote:

Its a great idea but i dont know maybe some players would like to add then another ranking for speed games then or something else. or ranking for team 2v2 or team 3v3. idk o,O

I don't think so.

2v2, 3v3 and 4v4 is same. 1v1 you are playing for your own and also ffa you are playing on your own, just with a bit "harder" because you need to find yourself between other people.
the item settings (for example speed) don't matter in rankings.

2v2 is same team game as 3v3 or 4v4 is

1v1 is alone

ffa is also alone but different alone

team is team

ps: sorry for bad english

Offline
Clan: Unit

Koroleva wrote:

or ranking for team 2v2 or team 3v3. idk o,O

haha nah.

__________________________________________________________________________

Offline
Clan: HC

a rank according to the powerup setting would be greet also, cose thin and speed are definitly not same

Haru. †'s picture
Offline
Champion
Clan: Sora

Kanches is a FFA 8 player.

Offline
Clan: RiP

+1 hero ;)

Highest ranks:
1v1 1443
FFA 1930
Team 2146

Offline

+1

Fire.''s picture
Offline

+1 too :)

[

Anubis's picture
Offline
Clan: tySt

You played 1v1 in normal field. It's WAY easier to get rank in that way. Like you play against ffa 1700 players who have no idea how to play the game properly and get 6+ in rank each game. Ofc it's fast and EASY to gain rank if we play with your settings

If you play 1v1 scaled against a ffa 1700 player when you're around ffa 2200 you get like 0,5 rank from each win (Ranked on) . If you somehow manage to lose to a player with that rank you lose around 10 points.

So basically it takes you around 20 games in order to get 10 rank points by playing against a ffa 1700 and if you loose 1 time, you'll go back to square one. Therefore it ain't as easy as you think it is. Only the good players may find this easy, but not the ffa 700-1900 people who I see butthurt all over this forum commenting on how they want a seperate ranking system for 1v1 players.

I'd still do the same thing as I'm doing atm on Anubis to keep my rank if I'd only play 8ppl ffa games on this acc instead of 1v1. I've already reached ffa 2,2k on another account by only playing 8 ppl ffa games.

You want to be on top of the highscores? Then you gotta be better than those who are on top of the list. Some of you don't even know how good some of "us 1v1 players" are in 8 ppl ffa, but just because you havn't seen us play a 8 ppl ffa game, you think we're bad at the game. (This comment was aimed towards the people who I've seen commenting about me not deserving my rank

DeclanR wrote:

This would also put Rami95, anubis and the other leaderboard rank hoarders in a seperate category to actual skilled players worthy of the rank

The amount of ignorant people in this game is too high

TheNewSound's picture
Offline
Clan: Baas

-1

 

It is the total scoreboard, no need to make separate bullshit.

keep it as it is.

__________________________________________________________

"Then you have squared circles" - 6stijn6

Cut
Offline

Hm...Not important, not at all

1v1 separated cannot exist, since it’s too late and can’t be separated.

Like Anubis said, 1v1 normal field and 1v1 scaled is totally different. D-hero you are saying that 1v1 is easy to gain rank? Absolutely not, in 1v1 scaled, for me it took 2000+ plays to reach the rank where I am now. So it’s not easy maybe in 1v1 normal field it is.

There is alot of players who also plays ffa 8 and 1v1 normal field, scaled, also different playstyles. I can mention Therealmadridcf, I remember how he reached the highest score, by playing mostly games in 1v1 normal field and 1v1 scaled than ffa 8 to get such a high rank, and I’m pretty sure there are many players who do that like him. Every player has different playstyles, mostly are good at only 1v1’s, many are good at both ffa 8 and 1v1, or some are good at everything, that’s why 1v1 can’t be separated, cause it’s too late.

The mods were once planning on implementing some coool gamemodes, like instant respawn, capture the flag, collect 'curve fever', obstacles.. Amazing ideas !! but sadly they were too lazy, and we are still left with ffa and teams, 1 gamemode: Having a 'frst to' that depends on the amount of players.

Like Thenewsound said, just keep it as it is, because the game scoreboard have been same over years now.

My FFA Record: 2570

My accounts:
Rami95 - Main account
ELF
I'm sexy And I know it

Offline
Champion

Cut wrote:

everything, that’s why 1v1 can’t be separated, cause it’s too late.

The mods were once planning on implementing some coool gamemodes, like instant respawn, capture the flag, collect 'curve fever', obstacles.. Amazing ideas !! but sadly they were too lazy, 

We do moderate, not develop

goatplayer's picture
Offline

+1

Offline

split it

IDEEKAY's picture
Offline
Clan: cunt

I vote split it

Offline
Champion
ffa eu nr. 66
1v1 eu nr. 60
team eu nr. 26
Clan: LR

As we can all see, only 1v1 players are strongly against that.

TheNewSound's picture
Offline
Clan: Baas

Many people like to play the game differently, the rank number is a combination of all games, seperating lists would technically not be possible without resetting ranks.

But nonetheless i wouldn't like 100 different ranking lists for each powerup that was enabled (speed rankins, thin rankins, 1vs1 rankings ffa rankings, 2vs2 rankings or whatever ffs).

Just because you guys dont like that some other ppl are rising in the ranking list doesn't mean that we have to split rankings for every single fcking thing in the game. 

So just keep it as it is.

__________________________________________________________

"Then you have squared circles" - 6stijn6

Offline
Champion

Yes split them, I would be 5th if there wasn't rankwhores above me who only play against 700 rank nubs once a week

Incred's picture
Offline
Champion

Good idea. But not sure what Geert thinks.

celineam †'s picture
Offline
Clan: MISS

D-HERO wrote:

As we can all see, only 1v1 players are strongly against that.

Word lol

Pjush's picture
Offline
Champion
Clan: HC

TheNewSound wrote:

Many people like to play the game differently, the rank number is a combination of all games, seperating lists would technically not be possible without resetting ranks.

But nonetheless i wouldn't like 100 different ranking lists for each powerup that was enabled (speed rankins, thin rankins, 1vs1 rankings ffa rankings, 2vs2 rankings or whatever ffs).

Just because you guys dont like that some other ppl are rising in the ranking list doesn't mean that we have to split rankings for every single fcking thing in the game. 

So just keep it as it is.

I actually agree, Vincent. I think its nice enough as it is, FFA and team. I dont care about who is on 1st, and who is 100th. We all know, ok that guy is good, that guy is noob. Splitting more ranks will just look ugly, and in fact, 1v1 - its still free for all, u have no team, ur alone.

6stijn6's picture
Offline

Yes should be split

Red Speed Pro

Offline
Champion
ffa eu nr. 66
1v1 eu nr. 60
team eu nr. 26
Clan: LR

Ok i gotta ask, are mods kidding with this game, they don't even care, nobody looked at this, its under general 2 weeks already, i even said to dutch4all if he can look at it, but nobody doesn't care at all. Mods please start to do your job. 

Mods in this game are one BIG jokers

- Only geert has power to check ip's 

- They are hiring new mods ( which don't work at all, or i can't see that)

-They don't look at the forum

- They don't respond to mails or direct contacts

I really hope some of this will change.. 

Best regards, Dan :*

Offline
Clan: 69

D-HERO wrote:

Ok i gotta ask, are mods kidding with this game, they don't even care, nobody looked at this, its under general 2 weeks already, i even said to dutch4all if he can look at it, but nobody doesn't care at all. Mods please start to do your job. 

Mods in this game are one BIG jokers

- Only geert has power to check ip's 

- They are hiring new mods ( which don't work at all, or i can't see that)

-They don't look at the forum

- They don't respond to mails or direct contacts

I really hope some of this will change.. 

Best regards, Dan :*

I sent message to Geert that i want be forum mod cuz i would be really active but he is still doesn't answer.

Offline
ffa eu top 1.1%
team eu top 4.7%
Clan: KOLL

i think you can get only mod if they search somebody. and at the moment there is no place for a new mod

 

~~signature~~

My time:

Offline
Clan: 69

NOWODNY2 wrote:

i think you can get only mod if they search somebody. and at the moment there is no place for a new mod

Yep, but it would be nice if will Geert at least answer.

GameRich's picture
Offline

TheNewSound wrote:

Many people like to play the game differently, the rank number is a combination of all games, seperating lists would technically not be possible without resetting ranks.

But nonetheless i wouldn't like 100 different ranking lists for each powerup that was enabled (speed rankins, thin rankins, 1vs1 rankings ffa rankings, 2vs2 rankings or whatever ffs).

Just because you guys dont like that some other ppl are rising in the ranking list doesn't mean that we have to split rankings for every single fcking thing in the game. 

So just keep it as it is.

For sure we don't need to seperate them like THAT. But 1v1 is different in another way, I've looked at a few 1v1 matches and I'll need an ENTIRE different strategy for them as my strategy in ffa games. Besides that, 1v1 games are easier to win because you have only one opponent instead of 5.

+1

CF2 > CF3

~ Part of the Flappy Curve Testing Team~

Geert's picture
Offline
Developer
Moderator
Clan: MOD

Spoiler: Highlight to view

Please don't bump old threads.

This user is warned for this post because of:
Bump threads

Warned by Geert

Edited by: 
Geert on 8 December, 2014 - 16:36

 

Topic locked